Written by Dave Allan Monday, 05 July 2010 21:44
One of the things that the lightweight Gazza's Tears programme got right was that football in England changed after the 1990 World Cup. However the mistake it made was suggesting it had changed for the better.
Firstly, it assumed that all-seater stadiums were a change for the
better. The interests who have benefited from all-seater stadiums were
the TV companies, the clubs themselves who could charge fans a bigger
price to attend matches and the more affluent supporter who could afford
these prices.
Secondly the programme suggested by having the most expensively
assembled group of circus freaks from the four corners of the world
actually made the game better and more interesting. It is arguable that
there is more skill in England's top league than pre-1990 but the game
on the whole is not 'better'. There is no greater drama pre Italy 1990,
there are not more exciting games, there is not more atmosphere inside
the stadium, there is no greater TV punditry and most importantly (as
this is a World Cup site), there is no greater chance of England winning
the World Cup.
What will be the state of English football 20 years hence? It is a sobering
fact that if things continue as they are, the average age of a Premier
League season ticket holder will be pushing 70. It is currently 47. It
is little wonder there is no atmosphere in Premier League stadiums (I
know its stadia but in 1990, no football fan would have used the word
stadium - they were 'grounds').
There is only one workable solution. Tear down the majority of seating
at ALL English football grounds. Make these season ticket holders stand
for 90 minutes and we would soon see them being handed back in droves
freeing them up for younger, more physically fit people.
If this does not happen then football will slowly die as younger people
turn their attention to sports or other activities where they have a chance of
being a part of something.

| < Prev | Next > |
|---|